Questions? Call Us.

Toll Free: 1-800-517-3005
Mon-Fri 8am to 5pm (Pacific Time)
Welcome Guest!
Log In  /  Join Us
safetotosite pro3 Hwang Ui-jo Questioned Over Illegal Filming Allegations...no Punishment → Forgiveness?
Back To Blogs List
 The suspicion of illegal filming of soccer player Hwang Ui-jo is getting bigger and bigger.


On the 21st, Money Today reported that Mr. A, who distributed the video that Hwang Ui-jo allegedly filmed illegally, is Hwang Ui-jo's closest confidant.


According to the report, the victim's lawyer, Lee Eun-i, said that she could not reveal the detailed identity of Mr. A, but that he was Hwang Ui-jo's closest confidant.

Lee also said that he attended A's pretrial interrogation on April 16, and that A claimed to have received the video directly from Hwang Ui-jo. Hwang Ui-jo also denied that A stole the phone.




Earlier, on June 25, A introduced herself as Hwang Ui-jo's ex-girlfriend on Instagram, exposing his private life and circulating a video of their sexual intercourse.




In response, Hwang Ui-jo refuted the claims and said that the video was leaked because he lost his phone in Greece in November 2022. However, as more details of the case emerge, it is becoming clear that this claim is false.




In court, the claim that the phone had been factory reset was disputed. Importantly, the victim never consented to the video.




The victim of the video distribution claimed that she had dated Hwang Ui-jo in the past, but that she had never consented to the video and had requested that it be deleted.




The lawyer said that Hwang Ui-jo had stated that he did not want A to be punished, which raised questions. It was Hwang Ui-jo who pressed charges against A. He also encouraged the victims of the video leak to press charges together to catch A quickly.




However, Mr. Hwang believes that Mr. A may not be the same person as the person who distributed the video and threatened him. He said he would forgive the leaker even if he was right. 토토 




On June 20, the police announced that they believe that Ms. A, who exposed Hwang Ui-jo's private life in June, and the video's distributor are the same person.




According to reports, A is a woman and has denied any wrongdoing.




Hwang Ui-jo was investigated on June 18 as a suspect in connection with illegal filming. It is understood that the ex-lover who was the victim of the video leak was converted into a suspect because she stated that she never agreed to the filming.




In response, Hwang's legal representative said that he had been receiving constant threats from the blackmailer regarding the video, and that there were also demands for money.




"It was a consensual video between lovers at the time, and Hwang does not currently have the video in his possession, nor has he leaked it at all," he emphasized.




"This case started when Hwang Ui-jo was the victim of a video leak," he said, adding, "The so-called 'killing of Hwang Ui-jo' is being carried out in a very malicious manner."




A day earlier, on the 20th, Hwang Ui-jo, who claimed to have been threatened by A, said in court that he would forgive A even if he was the distributor, raising questions. Netizens responded, "It's possible that he gave it to an acquaintance and it was distributed," "He's losing his ability to speak straight," "I was wondering what kind of relationship he had to complain for punishment, but he's his closest aide and handed him the phone? And he's representing the country while crying victim???? It's crazy", "Mr. A was arrested for distributing the video, but what does it mean that he might not be the real culprit, then why is Mr. A there?", etc. 


Post a New Comment
Name:
9 - 3 =  <-- Please solve this simple math problem to post a comment.

Comments





. fuzz
fuzz
fuzz
fuzz